Difference between revisions 693935 and 693939 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Alt.talk.creationism
What to do with pages like this one. It clearly (in my mind) does not belong in an encyclopedia, but who defines the limits? Any ideas? --[[User:Snoyes|snoyes]] 01:42 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

: Perfectly OK, factually verifiable content. The original version was not NPOV but now it's fine. We have many articles about websites, so why not about newsgroups? Many of those have their own culture. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 01:51 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)

: I hope that Snowbird will expand the list. But for the time being it can stay. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 04:48 Feb 23, 2003 (UTC)

"It can stay"?  Why, because Eloquence has spoken? -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]

: Because of the reasons I have given. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]]

::Ah.  I didn't realize it was your decision to make unilaterally.  -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]

⏎

⏎
:::Deleting a page, or significant portions thereof, requires consensus (in the Wikipedia "near unanimous" sense). I have expressed strong informed dissent with a removal of the information, this means that it can stay. You can do the same with any page on [[Votes for deletion]]. Feel free to support my proposal to use voting in the Wikipedia decision making process. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 05:16 Feb 23, 2003 (UTC)