Difference between revisions 693939 and 693949 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Alt.talk.creationism
What to do with pages like this one. It clearly (in my mind) does not belong in an encyclopedia, but who defines the limits? Any ideas? --[[User:Snoyes|snoyes]] 01:42 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

: Perfectly OK, factually verifiable content. The original version was not NPOV but now it's fine. We have many articles about websites, so why not about newsgroups? Many of those have their own culture. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 01:51 Feb 22, 2003 (UTC)

(contracted; show full)

:::Deleting a page, or significant portions thereof, requires consensus (in the Wikipedia "near unanimous" sense). I have expressed strong informed dissent with a removal of the information, this means that it can stay. You can do the same with any page on [[Votes for deletion]]. Feel free to support my proposal to use voting in the Wikipedia decision making process. --[[User:Eloquence|Eloquence]] 05:16 Feb 23, 2003 (UTC)

⏎

⏎
::::Your choice of words makes it sound as if the decision is entirely yours.  -- [[User:Zoe|Zoe]]