Difference between revisions 7977996 and 7978208 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
User talk:Neutrality
<center>{{pic of the day}}</center>
<div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 220px;">'''Archives [[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 1|1]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 2|2]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 3|3]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 4|4]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 5(contracted; show full)==Arbitration candidate questions==

Just incase you missed this [[User_talk:Neutrality/Arbitration_question]].
Thanks [[User:Arminius|Arminius]] 07:13, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

== Partition of India ==

You voted for [[Partition of India]], this week's [[Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week|Collaboration of the week]].  Please come and help it become a [[Wikipedia:Featured_articles|featured]]-[[Wikipedia:What is a featured article|standard]] article.
⏎
⏎
== Air force one ==

I was reading the Air Force One article and was struck by the irrelevance of the passage that I removed. Additionally according to most reports the incident in question did not happen.

This is from the Washington Post article "The Bird Was Perfect But Not For Dinner; In Iraq Picture, Bush Is Holding the Centerpiece" by Mike Allen on December 4, 2003:

''The White House has updated its account of an airborne conversation in which a British Airways pilot wondered into his radio if he had just seen Air Force One and was told that it was a Gulfstream 5, a much smaller plane. White House officials first said that the British Airways pilot had talked with the Air Force One pilot. Bush aides now say the conversation occurred between the British Airways pilot and an air traffic control worker.

''"I don't think everybody was clear on exactly how that conversation happened," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

''British Airways said it has been unable to confirm the new version. "We've looked into it," a spokeswoman said from London. "It didn't happen."

In view of it not being true and it not really seeming relevant to a general overview of Air Force One. I deleted the sentence in question. I am just a casual reader of Wikipedia and hoped to make a small improvement, which I thought was the purpose of the site. As many people read it, they may make small changes that improve the articles. I apologize if I misinterperted the rules.