Difference between revisions 7978208 and 7979167 on enwiki

<center>{{pic of the day}}</center>
<div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: 1px solid #333 ; padding: 5px; width: 220px;">'''Archives [[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 1|1]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 2|2]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 3|3]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 4|4]]''', '''[[User talk:Neutrality/Archive 5(contracted; show full)

In view of it not being true and it not really seeming relevant to a general overview of Air Force One. I deleted the sentence in question. I am just a casual reader of Wikipedia and hoped to make a small improvement, which I thought was the purpose of the site. As many people read it, they may make small changes that improve the articles. I apologize if I misinterperted the rules.
⏎
⏎
::I agree with you that the British are more reliable than the Bush administration, it was the Bush administration that originally created this story to sensationalize the Thanksgivin g trip. It was given a prominent place in all the stories filed immediately after the trip. However, as it was further investigated it seemed rather unplausible as it wouldn't make sense for the plane to fly by the UK on its way to Iraq. 

::Scott McClellan's quote in this article is him trying to explain why it was before they insisted that the conversation happened. It was British Airways that denied it, they were unable to locate either a pilot or controller who recaclled the converstion.

::Thanks for repsonding and for your work on Wikipedia. Its a valuable resource that I make use of frequently.