Difference between revisions 95839905 and 97080558 on enwiki

There is a history of dispute with respect to the article, which can be traced from it's previous location ([[hypernumber]]), in the [[Talk:Hypernumber|talk]] page. Ignoring all the references that I gave (most of them formally published) and replacing them with a single reference to a single-user-maintained religious web site is inacceptable to me, therefore I resurrected the deleted content here as a first step. Maybe the new location, [[Musean hypernumber]], is more acceptable for the time being. Je(contracted; show full)

* "In response to <name>'s response, Musès' in one of his articles refers to the real numbers as epsilon_nought." - yes, I remember seeing this. I'll add this to the note about i_0 being commutative and associative under multiplication, because I believe it was mentioned in this context. Thanks!

Thanks all for the constructive comments! Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 01:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
===Other feedback===

* The article references need to be brought up to a standard that is desired in Wikipedia. This will allow proper referencing within the article, and proper indexing and hotlinking where applicable. I'll follow-up on the desired format on references.

* Not all articles have DOI references; I'm not sure whether I can get these for the older articles, because the journals are either defunct or have been renamed. I'll check.

Looks like I'm not getting this all done in 2006, so right now it'll be mid January 2007 at the earliest. Oh well. Thanks, Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 05:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)