Difference between revisions 97080558 and 99011829 on enwiki

< previous diff
next diff >
Talk:Musean hypernumber
There is a history of dispute with respect to the article, which can be traced from it's previous location ([[hypernumber]]), in the [[Talk:Hypernumber|talk]] page. Ignoring all the references that I gave (most of them formally published) and replacing them with a single reference to a single-user-maintained religious web site is inacceptable to me, therefore I resurrected the deleted content here as a first step. Maybe the new location, [[Musean hypernumber]], is more acceptable for the time being. Je(contracted; show full)

* Not all articles have DOI references; I'm not sure whether I can get these for the older articles, because the journals are either defunct or have been renamed. I'll check.

Looks like I'm not getting this all done in 2006, so right now it'll be mid January 2007 at the earliest. Oh well. Thanks, Jens [[User:Koeplinger|Koeplinger]] 05:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
⏎
⏎
== Notability ==

Could you add some references to where ''other'' people have referred to these numbers? As it stands, it's not clear that this material is widely studied at all, with so many references by the same author, and almost all of them in the same journal. [[User:CMummert|CMummert]] 02:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)