Difference between revisions 17146540 and 17148182 on enwiktionary

==''[[cane]]'' and ''[[can]]'' in [[w:consilience|consilience]] ==

{| align=center
| width=50% |
 eng:	{{l|en|cane}}
 esp:	{{l|es|caña}}
 fre:	{{l|fr|canne}}
 ita:	{{l|it|canna}}
(contracted; show full)do "experimental" things that endanger the quality, in terms of our established standards, then it leads me to believe that we would be better without you. When you make acceptable edits, like marking Sino-Korean etymologies back to Chinese sources, I have no objection with you. --[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 16:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


::::::	The quality first, no doubt. I hope my experiment aims for it, however you may doubt. Honestly, we just swing from prejudice to prejudice, from POV to POV, as I argue again and again. So it should better be ''debated'' by many than ''dictated'' by you or a few. So you should have kept it on while it should have been debated, however terribly it might degrade the quality of a page out of hundreds of thousands.

{{User:KYPark/hanbox|[[見]][[蚊]][[拔]][[劒]]}}
::::::	Instead, you just ''saw a mosquito and drew a sword'' (cf. the hanja box) hypersensitively, in no time, indeed! Such never aims for quality and hospitality at large in the long run. But it certainly serves, if not aims, for indignity and hostility in this free open community, I fear. {{quote|I do think that folks here sometimes rush to action without talking to others first, which is probably the biggest failing of the Wiktionary community in general. I can sympathize to some extent, as we are generally all quite particular about things (one must be particular, in order to enjoy working on a dictionary ^_^ )...  <br> -- Cheers, Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 23:07, 10 July 2012 (UTC) <br> @ [[User talk:KYPark#Location of sandboxed entries for creating / editing draft versions]]}} 

::::::	So said Eirikr when Chuck Entz deleted [[Talk:屯/Korean]] (I created after ''talk'' to Eirikr) without ''talk'', exactly as you did wrong and injustice to me. Chuck and you look like enjoying annoying me in particular for one reason or another. Please say honestly, honorably, that this is untrue, and that no one told you either to behave or not to behave in such a way as to contribute to "the biggest failing of the Wiktionary community in general." 

::::::	BTW, let's keep talking ''in context''. So I repeat, "why do you water it down?" That is, if "you object to KYPark adding [[蔗]] as a translation for sugar cane ..., and to steering KYPark's more exploratory energies towards one of the WT discussion pages?" as Eirikr asked you. You are asked to answer two questions: Eirikr's and mine.   
:::::: --[[User:KYPark|KYPark]] ([[User talk:KYPark|talk]]) 02:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)⏎
⏎
: As this Talk page currently stands, I'm not sure I fully understand what either of you are striving towards.  I do not mean this as a criticism, and rather as a statement of confusion.  I look forward to your replies, which will hopefully resolve my confusion.  -- Kind regards, [[User:Eirikr|Eiríkr&nbsp;Útlendi]]&nbsp;│&nbsp;<small style="position: relative; top: -3px;">''[[User talk:Eirikr|Tala&nbsp;við&nbsp;mig]]''</small> 07:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)