Difference between revisions 17144958 and 17146540 on enwiktionary

==''[[cane]]'' and ''[[can]]'' in [[w:consilience|consilience]] ==

{| align=center
| width=50% |
 eng:	{{l|en|cane}}
 esp:	{{l|es|caña}}
 fre:	{{l|fr|canne}}
 ita:	{{l|it|canna}}
(contracted; show full)

:::: You look like trying to agree with him, contrary to "to understand [your] position perfectly." He is focally asking you about your ''objection'' to me! Why do you water it down? --[[User:KYPark|KYPark]] ([[User talk:KYPark|talk]]) 09:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC) 
⏎
::::: Why are you trying to tell ''me'' what ''I'' believe? I don't care about you specifically; I care about the quality of the dictionary. When you do "experimental" things that endanger the quality, in terms of our established standards, then it leads me to believe that we would be better without you. When you make acceptable edits, like marking Sino-Korean etymologies back to Chinese sources, I have no objection with you. --[[User:Metaknowledge|Μετάknowledge]]<small><sup>''[[User talk:Metaknowledge|discuss]]/[[Special:Contributions/Metaknowledge|deeds]]''</sup></small> 16:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

: As this Talk page currently stands, I'm not sure I fully understand what either of you are striving towards.  I do not mean this as a criticism, and rather as a statement of confusion.  I look forward to your replies, which will hopefully resolve my confusion.  -- Kind regards, [[User:Eirikr|Eiríkr&nbsp;Útlendi]]&nbsp;│&nbsp;<small style="position: relative; top: -3px;">''[[User talk:Eirikr|Tala&nbsp;við&nbsp;mig]]''</small> 07:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)