Difference between revisions 152227 and 152334 on testwiki

===[[Orbit Magazine1]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}{{subst:at}} '''delete'''. -[[User:Riley Huntley|Riley Huntley]] [[Meta:SWMT|(SWMT)]] 02:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
===[[Orbit Magazine1]]===

:{{la|Orbit Magazine1}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orbit Magazine1|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 17#{{anchorencode:Orbit Magazine1}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Orbit_Magazine1 Stats]</span>)
:({{Find sources|Orbit Magazine1}})
This defunct independent publication fails [[WP:GNG]] by a landslide, as well as [[WP:BOOK]], regarding publications generally. I'll posit there will be no upcoming coverage, as the publication itself is out of print, and it has received no major coverage since its closing. That said, most of the coverage I found only mentioned the fact that the publication was disestablished. This mention is usually in conjunction with [[WP:BLP|ostensibly living, relatively unknown persons]] who give local press commentary in stories about other topics entirely. Neither they nor Orbit Magazine are covered with any substance. I don't dispute the independent publication Orbit Magazine existed; I just can't find any evidence the publication was significant within its geographical area or among its peers, or that it had any measurable impact in the field. This goes especially for while it lasted, but the same could be said for its enduring, encyclopedic legacy. Note: this nomination is partly procedural, as it has been tagged for over 2 years regarding notability.⏎
{{subst:ab}}