Difference between revisions 152334 and 152479 on testwiki

{{subst:at}}<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was    '''delete'''. -[[User:Riley Huntley|Riley Huntley]] [[Meta:SWMT|(SWMT)]] 02:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
===[[Orbit Magazine1]]===

(contracted; show full)bit Magazine are covered with any substance. I don't dispute the independent publication Orbit Magazine existed; I just can't find any evidence the publication was significant within its geographical area or among its peers, or that it had any measurable impact in the field. This goes especially for while it lasted, but the same could be said for its enduring, encyclopedic legacy. Note: this nomination is partly procedural, as it has been tagged for over 2 years regarding notability.
{{subst:ab}}